Thursday, May 6, 2010

Postmodern Perfect, Or How to Make an American Quilt

A double feature of Kick-Ass and Hot Tub Time Machine at a drive-in movie theater a couple of weekends ago got me thinking about postmodernity -- again.

Both films are a reminder that these days creativity is about compiling previously imagined and executed texts, fulfilling the now ever-present postmodern expectation that any media text can be part of the creative toolbox. This can easily hinge on an over-the-top, relentless cut-and-paste storytelling style favored by the likes of Tarantino, but I was pleasantly surprised by these films' use of intertextuality and appropriation. Maybe we're just getting better at it and Tarantino was the unlucky guinea pig in the 90s, unable to shed his unfortunate style in the present day.


Hot Tub Time Machine (dir. Steve Pink), a comedy about time travel back to sometime in the 80s, relies on cultural references of the past to support its narrative but ventures into the realm of contemplating the time-space continuum through the casting of John Cusack, a man who (through no effort of his own) is a walking reference to 80s cool. He nearly single-handedly connotes an entire index of pop culture references: Peter Gabriel's In Your Eyes, the boombox, "I want my two dollars", fingerless gloves and kickboxing, pre-SNS romantic sentimentality among teenagers, and so much more. His aging gracefully only helps solidify these allusions.


Kick-Ass (dir. Matthew Vaughn), a film based on a comic book series of the same name, celebrates its intertextuality differently. Riffing off the comic book genre, it playfully references Batman (Big Daddy's costume and demeanor), Spider-man (was Aaron Johnson cast in the role of Dave Lizewski/Kick-Ass  because his voice uncannily resembles that of Tobey Maguire's?), and most comically and perhaps unintentionally, Hamburglar, the fictional burger thief imagined by a long-gone McDonald's campaign. This is made possible by the film's biggest hero, Hit Girl, a potty mouthed eleven year-old who dons a cloak, mask, and purple wig while acrobatically assassinating her father's enemies. 


Her costume, size, and sneakiness are a subtle reminder of this bygone era of McDonald's advertising history. Interestingly, Hamburglar himself seems to be a bastardization of the protagonist Arsole Fantüme from the French novel Arsole Fantüme, Gentleman Immoralist by Marcel Maurice and Pierre, originally published in 1901 and recently republished last year. Fantüme, like Hamburglar, wears a wide-brimmed hat, a mask, and cloak. 


While none of these bear the mark of direct inspiration, their similarities are nonetheless part of an on-going creative process of constructing culture through building on the past, most likely without being conscious of it. The riffing and intermingling of styles and cultural references and the absence of a fixed center create somewhat of a feedback loop of meaning. Meanwhile, the context in which these two films were viewed -- from the private sphere of our '87 BMW and the atmosphere of the drive-in, a relic of film spectatorship -- contributes to this.


n.

Friday, March 5, 2010

The Thrill Isn't Gone

I might have said some bad things about Martin Scorsese sometime in the late 90s, probably after I saw Bringing Out the Dead. I wanted so badly to enjoy that film -- to re-experience some version of Taxi Driver -- but it just didn't happen. Soon after, he directed Gangs of New York, a film that felt unnecessarily long and theatrical. (Maybe turn-of-the-century New York was too distant a subject to his preferred backdrop of the Lower East Side circa 1970?) The Aviator forced me to question Leonardo DiCaprio's sense of good taste and whether or not Scorsese was still capable of delivering a daring, no-nonsense, unforgiving, meaningful film ever again. I wondered if he had been Spielberged in some way: had he given up on the visual style that graced his early work, defining for generations of filmmakers to come a unique way to play with perspective, conventions of editing, and audience's expectations? The Rolling Stones aside, what happened to his good taste?

Then in 2005 he directed No Direction Home: Bob Dylan, a D.A. Pennebaker-esque journey into the living legend's life. Here suddenly was a film that didn't feel like Hollywood. It felt like vintage Scorsese.

Even some of his recent mainstream films have revealed a return to a cinematic style worthy of acclaim. The Departed, a film with an all-star cast, dripping with Hollywood energy, was surprisingly unlike some of the hyped but predictable and ultimately disappointing Boston-based, troubled cop melodramas that were released roughly around the same time (Gone Baby Gone, Mystic River).  


Shutter Island wasn't groundbreaking, but it wasn't disappointing either. It held my attention, looked amazing, and showed aspects of Scorsese's daring side. He had made psychological horrors before, but not like this one. This film had a beautiful ugliness that few are capable of orchestrating on this scale. Music never takes a backseat in his films, and this film particularly relied on sound to envelope audiences, using works by masters of sonic invention like John Cage, Gyorgy Ligeti, and others, favoring dissonance over harmony. Shutter also proved his fearless and ongoing approach to getting inside a tortured character's head and visually illustrating its contents, as well as which stories are worth translating cinematically. The New York Times fittingly described this film as Scorsese's "something else."

But what has really restored my faith in Martin Scorsese's directorial genius and good taste is his current line-up of films that are in pre-production: an untitled George Harrison documentary (a film about the most overlooked but possibly most complicated and interesting Beatle), The Invention of Hugo Cabret (based on Brian Selznick's brilliantly crafted cinema-meets-Georges-Mélies-meets-graphic-novel), and Sinatra (no description necessary).


There will never be another Mean Streets, but there will be more journeys into the complicated mind and behavior of well developed characters and real people, carefully constructed snapshots of a certain time and place, and the creation of visually inventive experiences for audiences.


Martin Scorsese is back.

n.